Artifact:
|
Property Name |
Brief Description |
UML Representation |
Introduction | A textual description that serves as a brief introduction to the model. | Tagged value, of type "short text". |
Survey Description | A textual description that contains information not reflected by the rest of the Business Use-Case Model, including typical sequences in which the business use cases are employed by users and functionality not handled by the Business Use-Case Model. | Tagged value, of type "formatted text". |
Business Use-Case Packages | The packages in the model, representing a hierarchy. | Owned via the association "represents", or recursively via the aggregation "owns". |
Business Goals | The business goals in the model, owned by the packages. | Owned recursively via the aggregation "owns". |
Business Use Cases | The business use cases in the model, owned by the packages. | Owned recursively via the aggregation "owns". |
Business Actors | The business actors in the model, owned by the packages. | Owned recursively via the aggregation "owns". |
Relationships | The relationships in the model, owned by the packages. | Owned recursively via the aggregation "owns". |
Diagrams | The diagrams in the model, owned by the packages. | Owned recursively via the aggregation "owns". |
The Business Use Case Model is outlined and partly detailed during the Inception phase and fully detailed and adjusted during the Elaboration phase.
A Business-Process Analyst is responsible for the integrity of the Business Use Case Model, ensuring that:
Note that the business-process analyst is not responsible for the business use-case packages, business use cases, business actors, relationships, or the diagrams themselves; instead, these are under the corresponding business designer's responsibilities.
If the purpose of the business modeling effort is to reengineer the target organization, you should consider maintaining two variants of the Business Use-Case Model: one that shows the business actors and business use cases of the current organization (sometimes called "as-is"), and one that shows the target organization with new business actors and business use cases ("to-be").
If you are considering a significant redesign of the way the target organization works (business reengineering), this separation is needed otherwise the redesign will be developed without knowing what the proposed changes really are at the end, and you will not be able to estimate the costs of those changes. It is like an architect who is asked to draw up plans for changing a townhouse into three flats, without having an as-is blueprint from which to work.
The cost of maintaining two Business Use-Case Models is not insignificant, and you should carefully consider how much effort you put into a current model. Typically, you would not do more than identify and briefly describe the business use cases and business actors. You would also briefly outline the business use cases you determine are key to the effort, possibly illustrating this with a simple activity diagram. The level of detail you choose should aim at providing a shared understanding of the target organization.
You would not need this separation if:
See also Guidelines: Target-Organization Assessment.
Rational Unified
Process
|